While both sides of the issue have arguments, medical marijuana has some key proponents who give it a large amount of legitimacy. Bacco Farms Recreational Marijuana Dispensary-Flint Dispensaries offers excellent info on this.

  1. Consumer studies – The organisation has reported that the benefits offered by the medication tend to be far more important for individuals suffering from AIDS or any type of terminal cancer than any of the dangers, including those that are substantiated or those that are even suspected. They also argued that they should also be lenient in the use of medical marijuana for people who are terminally ill, for the same reason that the FDA is swift to approve new cancer drugs.
  2. The ACP does not strongly argue in support of the benefits of medical marijuana, but they argue that it should not be listed as a drug regulated by Schedule I. They claim that there are situations under which it can be successful and that, compared to other drugs of the same classification, it is reasonably safe. For doctors prescribing it or patients taking it on recommendation, they most firmly advocate for legal protection.
  3. Jocelyn Elders, MD – Elders believes that the herbal treatment is less dangerous on a daily basis than many of the medications prescribed by physicians. She also argues that “overwhelming” evidence exists that it is successful in alleviating the effects of some forms of nausea, pain, and vomiting. For people struggling with cancer, AIDS, and multiple sclerosis, or the drugs they use to treat these disorders, it is particularly helpful.
  4. Donald Abrams, MD – Abrams reported in the Annals of Internal Medicine that patients with AIDS who either smoked marijuana or used the drug in a tablet had a more powerful immune system than those who used a false version of the drug. In addition, obviously, they had a greater appetite, because on average, they weighed four pounds more than those who took the false version.
  5. Judge Francis L. Young – Young is a Judge in DEA Administrative Law. He said that if they were to require it the DEA could not prohibit people from taking advantage of the beneficial effects of medical marijuana. He claimed that many advantages of cannabis as a prescription medication were clearly seen by a 9-6-88 decision.
  6. Gregory T. Carter, MD – Carter submits that Marinol is not a marijuana replacement containing many active ingredients other than THC intended to be simulated by Marinol.

7. Lester Grinspoon, MD – On the dangers of the use of the drug, Harvard Medical School’s Grinspoon claimed that there is no proof of the supposed health risks of marijuana. Although the drug has been “smoked widely” for more than four decades in Western culture, he acknowledged that there has not been a single case relating the use of marijuana to lung cancer or emphysema